Branding2 Feb 2026Simon Druery

Truth & Diagnosis: What’s real vs. what’s performative and how to tell the difference

Most organisations are not short on activity. They are short on truth.

Dashboards are full. Surveys are sent. Statements are published. Town halls are held. Content is shared. Engagement is measured. Culture is discussed. Brand is articulated.

And yet, many brand leaders still feel something is off.

The disconnect rarely comes from a lack of effort. It comes from mistaking signals of activity for evidence of reality. In branding, culture and experience, what looks like progress is often performance.

This is where diagnosis matters.

Before change. Before investment. Before another initiative. And before communicating it. Truth must come first.

The comfort of signals that feel true

Organisations rely on signals because they offer certainty, or at least the illusion of it. Numbers feel objective. Artefacts feel tangible. Outputs feel reassuring.

Common examples include:

  • Engagement survey scores that show improvement
  • Brand statements that articulate strong values
  • Regular internal communications activity
  • High participation in initiatives or events
  • Polished employer brand messaging
  • Positive feedback captured in controlled environments

None of these are meaningless. But none of them are truth on their own.

Signals are indicators, not diagnoses.

They tell you what is visible, measured, or reported. They rarely tell you what is felt, lived, or experienced when no one is watching.

What organisations often believe is working, and why

Many brand leaders believe things are working because the system tells them they are.

Engagement scores rise, so culture must be improving.
Brand guidelines are clear, so alignment must exist.
Comms are frequent, so people must be informed.
Values are articulated, so they must be lived.

This belief is understandable. Most organisations are built to reward execution, not inquiry. Activity is easier to validate than truth. Outputs are easier to manage than experience.

But belief based on signals alone creates blind spots.

People can participate without believing and comply without committing. They can even repeat language without feeling connected to it.

Often systems rarely capture this nuance.

Why Brand Leaders mistake activity for truth

There are a few reasons this pattern repeats.

First, activity is visible. Truth is not.
You can see a campaign. You cannot immediately see trust.

Second, metrics create comfort. They reduce ambiguity.
Culture, belonging, and brand experience live in ambiguity.

Third, organisations often ask the wrong questions.
They measure sentiment at a moment in time, not patterns of behaviour over time.

Finally, there is risk in going deeper.
Truth can challenge leadership narratives, organisational identity, and long held assumptions.

So activity becomes the proxy. And performance replaces diagnosis to unearth the ‘real’.

The cost of acting on false signals

When organisations act on signals instead of truth, the cost is not always immediate. It is cumulative.

You see it when:

  • Change initiatives stall or quietly fail
  • Rebrands feel disconnected from internal reality
  • EVP messages attract people who do not stay
  • Brand taglines prop up the ego, not stand apart
  • Engagement plateaus despite ongoing effort
  • Cynicism grows beneath polished language
  • People disengage emotionally while remaining operationally present

The most damaging cost is erosion of trust.

When people sense leadership is responding to appearances rather than lived experience, they stop telling the truth. Feedback becomes filtered. Participation becomes performative. Belonging weakens.

At that point, even the signals lose their reliability.

What evidence actually reflects reality

Truth does not usually announce itself. You have to find where it shows up in patterns.

Reality is reflected in:

  • What people say when there is no script
  • How decisions are made under pressure
  • Which behaviours are rewarded or ignored
  • Who feels safe to speak and who stays silent
  • How inconsistency is explained, or avoided
  • What happens between strategy decks and daily work

Qualitative evidence matters here. Stories. Language. Tension. Repetition. Silence.

So does triangulation. When multiple sources, teams, or experiences point to the same friction, it is rarely coincidence.

Truth lives in the alignment, or misalignment, between what is said, what is done, and what is experienced.

What good diagnosis looks like before change begins

Good diagnosis slows the organisation down before it speeds it up.

It resists jumping to solutions. It prioritises understanding over reassurance. Good diagnosis asks better questions, not just more of them.

Strong diagnostic work looks like:

  • Listening across levels, not just leadership
  • Looking for contradictions, not consensus
  • Exploring where language and behaviour diverge
  • Separating sentiment from experience
  • Naming discomfort without assigning blame

It also requires humility. A willingness to accept that what looks good on paper may not feel good in practice.

Diagnosis is not about finding fault. It is about unearthing the true reality.

Because meaningful change cannot be built on performance.


Belonging grows when truth is acknowledged

Belonging does not grow from assumptions or surface signals. It grows when organisations are willing to listen, question, and name what is really happening. Honest diagnosis signals that people’s lived experiences matter, that their reality is seen, and that change is grounded in understanding rather than performance.

When truth becomes part of how decisions are made, trust deepens and engagement becomes more meaningful. It creates the conditions for cultures and brands that people believe in, not because they are told to, but because they recognise themselves in the experience. That is where lasting change and genuine belonging, begins.


Need help unearthing the truth?

At Belong Creative, we support Brand Managers in diagnosing the reality of the lived experience for both customers and employees. Via interviews, focus groups and surveys we discover and report on what people really think. Only then is it possible to make better strategic decisions that position your brand for growth and performance. And that means helping people feel like they truly belong to your brand. 

Article by Simon Druery

Simon Druery is Director and Brand Strategist at Belong Creative. What gets him jumping out of bed each day is helping business owners and marketers craft brands that people want to belong to. When he’s not working you can find him travelling Australia in the family caravan and enjoying a tawny port by the fire.